Table 11: Pediatric Examination
|Physical Sign / Manoeuvre||Rationale||Technique(s)||Interpretation||Evidence||Pre-Clerkship||Clerkship|
|APGAR Score||To assess immediate neonatal well-being||Assess heart rate, respiratory effort, colour, muscle tone & responsiveness to stimuli on scale of 0, 1 or 2. Total score is measured out of 10, and given at 1 and 5 minutes after birth||Low APGAR scores alone do not predict poor neurologic outcome. Persistence of low scores at 10, 15, 20 minutes increases the risk of poor outcome.|
The change in APGAR scores over time provides a useful indication of the response to resuscitation.
|Poor inter-observer reliability of APGAR scores, particularly in infants who are most unwell.|
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2006.
|Tachypnea||Clinical detection of pneumonia||Observation for 60 seconds||RR>50 (2-12 months) or RR>40 (>12 months) suggests pneumonia||Sensitivity 40%, PPV 20%|
Specificity 74%, NPV 88%
|Wheeze in infants||To detect acute asthma, bronchiolitis||Wheezing in infants is characterized by high-pitched whistling or musical sounds, heard mainly during expiration||respiratory exam of wheezing shows good inter-rater reliability, but overall respiratory status most reliable|
wheeze is often mis-used term by parents, low reliability between clinical assessment & parental report of wheeze
|Stridor||To detect aspiration of a foreign object, croup, epiglottitis||Sound must be assessed along with history (choking, aspiration, cyanosis, wheeze)|
Stridor is predominantly an inspiratory noise, usually indicating extra-thoracic airway obstruction
|History is most useful for diagnosis of foreign body, correlates much better than physical exam findings. Stridor is an uncommon presenting sign of foreign body aspiration (choking & cough most common)|
epiglottitis generally associated with soft vibrating “snoring” rather than harsh stridor.
croup presents with harsh stridor, viral URTI symptoms, & brassy cough
|Physical examination abnormal in 80.4% of children with foreign bodies (stridor in 5.4%), but specificity was only 59.5%.|
|Ear pain||To detect otitis media||Observation & history||Ear pain is symptom most likely to be associated with bacterial otitis media (AOM). “Ear rubbing” has some predictive ability. Other symptoms (ear tugging/rubbing, crying, fever, poor appetite) are less specific & are commonly seen with viral illnesses.||Positive LR 3 - 7.3 across studies, and negative LR 0.4 - 0.6 Powers, 2007. Rothman, 2003.||1||3|
|Abnormal Tympanic Membrane Findings||To detect bacterial cause of AOM||Look at tympanic membrane anatomic landmarks, color, mobility||Physical examination findings of AOM are often taken in combination. Significant overlap in clinical findings & symptoms between bacterial & viral causes of tympanic membrane abnormalities.||Examination findings indicative of AOM are TM that is cloudy (LR 34), bulging (LR 51), immobile (LR 31), strongly red (LR 8.4)||1||3|
|Blood pressure||Screening for hypertension||Preferred method for BP measurement is auscultation.
Measurements should be taken in the child’s right arm, with child in the seated position.|
Screen with BP measurements in children >3 yrs of age unless risk factors present
|Hypertension in children is defined as SBP or DBP greater than or equal to 95% for gender, age & height on 3 occasions. Comparison to standardized reference charts for BP.|
Secondary hypertension (from underlying medical cause) is more common in children than in adults, and investigations should be undertaken to find cause of HTN.
|National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents, 2004.|
|Abdominal pain migration to RLQ, abdominal wall rigidity, and psoas sign||To predict/ diagnose appendicitis||Migration of abdominal pain to RLQ generally found on history.|
Abdominal wall rigidity reflects involuntary guarding (does not resolve with distraction)
Psoas sign is assessed by pain on hip flexion against resistance with the patient supine, or with pain on hip extension while patient lies on left side
|RLQ abdominal pain is a stronger predictor of appendicitis in adults than in children.|
Combination of physical examination signs are more helpful in predicting likelihood of appendicitis in children. Combined scores (Alvarado/ Pediatric Appendicitis scores which combine these findings can be used)
Inter-rater reliability of physical examination signs highest for RLQ pain and Rovsing signs. Better agreement between examiners re: overall risk of appendicitis.
|Pain that starts mid-abdominally and migrates to RLQ has positive LR 1.9-3.1, negative LR 0.41-0.72
involuntary guarding (rigidity) has positive LR 1.6-2.6, negative LR 0.21-0.61
Psoas sign has positive LR 2.0-2.5, negative LR 0.75-0.86|
When examiners had high clinical suspicion for appendicitis, 79-80% of the time, they were correct, when they felt extremely unlikely, they were correct 94-95% of the time.
|Dry mucous membranes, sunken eyes/fontanelle, drowsiness, irritability, acidotic breathing, cool mottled periphery, capillary refill > 2 sec.||To detect dehydration||Skin turgor measured by pinching skin fold lateral to umbilicus Capillary refill time evaluated by blanching an area of skin & awaiting time for normal color to return. Should be done in a warm room.||Combination of physical examination signs are more useful than single signs in isolation Abnormal skin turgor, prolonged capillary refill and abnormal respiratory pattern are best individual signs to use in assessment of dehydration||Prolonged capillary refill had positive LR 4.1, abnormal skin turgor LR 2.5, abnormal respiratory pattern LR 2.0 Sunken eyes & dry mucus membranes had LR 1.7, remainder of signs had imprecise results or positive LR < 0.5 Steiner, 2004.||1||3|
|Adams Forward-Bending Test||To identify scoliosis||Child bends forward with knees straight, examiner looks for asymmetry and/or rotation of the back or prominence of ribs/scapula on one side||Cobb angle > 10% on AP radiograph defines scoliosis|
Forward bending test is more accurate when combined with other measures (ie. scoliometer). High false positive rates with the test used alone.
|Barlow and Ortolani tests||To identify developmental dysplasia of the hip||Hips are tested individually in the flexed position while the child is on a hard surface. Diaper must be removed.|
For Barlow test, the hip is pushed back in order to dislocate a hip, and for the Ortolani test, the hip is abducted so that a dislocated hip can relocate.
|Skill of the examiner correlates with the sensitivity of these tests, as well as with age of the child (more difficult to detect dislocation with Ortolani and Barlow tests in older infants. In these children, Galeazzi sign, leg length discrepancy and abnormal thigh/gluteal folds are used for detection)Hips are tested individually in the flexed position while the child is on a hard surface. Diaper must be removed.|
Repeated clinical examination is recommended routinely in all infants (up to 12 months of age)
|Barlow NPV 0.99, PPV 0.22|
Combined (Ortolani & Barlow)
|Primitive reflexes and postural reactions||To screen for cerebral palsy and other neuro-developmental conditions||Common primitive reflexes include Moro, palmar and plantar grasp, rooting, sucking, placing, Galant, asymmetric tonic neck reflex. They generally are present at birth and decrease within the first year of life.|
Postural reactions (vertical suspension, horizontal suspension, etc.) require cortical integrity and develop after birth in the first year as the CNS matures.
|Persistence of primitive reflexes beyond 12 months of age is often seen in children with cerebral palsy|
Infants with 5 or more abnormal postural reactions are considered to be at risk for cerebral palsy or developmental retardation
|Denver Developmental Screening Test - Denver II||Used as a screen for developmental delay||Standardized test which combines examiner observation as well as parental report of the child’s skills in personal-social, fine motor, language and gross motor areas||Children with an abnormal Denver II are at higher risk of poor school performance, and lower IQ (<89)||26% of children with abnormal screens had poor school scores (compared to 10% of children with normal screens)|
Abnormal Denver II screens had higher incidence in low SES children.
IQ < 89 in 43% of children with abnormal Denver II
|Rourke Baby Record: Evidence Based Infant/Child Health Maintenance Guide||Evidence-based structured form used by primary care practicioners at each well-baby/well-child visit from 0-5 yrs. Used as a screen to identify concerns in growth, nutrition, development, behaviour and immunizations as well as to identify abnormal physical findings and congenital anomalies||At age-specific visits assess:|
-eyes (red reflex, cover/uncover)
-testicles, urinary stream
-hearing (clap test)
|Specific targeted evidence-based maneuvers at appropriate ages help to screen for feeding difficulties, congenital dislocation of the hips, vision and hearing abnormalities|
Targeted exam does not imply lack of general physical exam, but highlights areas of focus at each visit (1 week, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 months, and 2-3, 4-5 years)
|WHO and CDC growth charts||Growth charts that plot weight, length, head circumference, BMI, weight-for-length||Measurements taken at different ages are plotted on the appropriate curve to assess growth percentiles. Children generally follow along a given percentile curve.|
Length is measured for children < 24 months, and stature is measured for children > 24 months.
|WHO growth curves were developed using longitudinal data to reflect growth of exclusively breastfed infants across different cultures. They describe how healthy children should grow under optimal growth conditions. There was almost no variation among different ethnic groups.|
This contrasts with the CDC curves which describe how certain children grew in the United States over a span of 30 yrs.
Suggestion is to use WHO growth curves for the first 24 months of life. May use CDC or WHO curves for children > 24 months.
|Red reflex examination (neonate)||To identify eye abnormalities including refractive errors, glaucoma, retinoblastoma, retinal abnormalities||Direct opthalmoscope held to examiner’s eye, set to “0”. Test performed in a darkened room at a distance of 18 inches away from the child. Both eyes are examined simultaneously.|
Examining for diminished reflex, asymmetric reflex, white reflex
|Diminished reflexes may result from cataracts, unequal reflex may be seen with strabismus or unequal/high refractive errors.|
Leukokoria (white reflex) is highly suggestive of retinoblastoma.
|American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology And Strabismus, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association of Certified Orthoptists, 2008.||1||3|
|Cover/Uncover test||To test for strabismus||Have the child look at a distant object, then place an occluder over each eye. Watch for movement in the eye that is not occluded. (inwards indicates underlying exotropia, outwards indicates underlying esotropia).|
Test each eye individually
|Strabismus is a term for ocular misalignment.|
Normal visual pathway development relies on equally clear, focused images from both eyes.
|Consensus for screening|
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Section on Ophthalmology, 1996.
|Visual Acuity Testing||To detect refractive errors & eye diseases leading to amblyopia & strabismus||In young children (0-3 yrs), the child’s ability to fix and follow objects is assessed|
Full eye examination is necessary including inspection, pupil response and extra-ocular movements
|Abnormalities on exam may lead to diagnosis of conditions that cause amblyopia and strabismus (ie. refractive errors and glaucoma)||Visual acuity measurement should be performed at earliest time practical (approx. 3 yrs)|
Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine Section on Ophthalmology, American Association of Certified Orthoptists, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2003.
|Hearing test||Early intervention in children with hearing loss improves later language skills||Physical examination of the skin, eyes & ears is necessary|
Screening tests (any age)
-evoked otoacoustic emissions
-play audiometry (2-4 yrs)
-conventional pure tone audiometry (4 yrs +)
-visual reinforced audiometry (6-24 months)
-automated ABR (3-6 months)
|Abnormal hearing screens necessitate further diagnostic testing|
For any parental concerns regarding hearing in their child, audiometry should be undertaken
|Parents identify subtle hearing loss as early as 12 months prior to the physician identifying a problem|
- American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Section on Ophthalmology. Eye examination and vision screening in infants, children, and young adults. Pediatrics 1996 Jul;98(1):153-157.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Committee on Obstetric Practice. The Apgar score. Pediatrics 2006 Apr;117(4):1444-1447.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology And Strabismus, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association of Certified Orthoptists. Red reflex examination in neonates, infants, and children. Pediatrics 2008 Dec;122(6):1401-1404.
- Bayoglu BU, Bakar EE, Kutlu M, Karabulut E, Anlar B. Can preschool developmental screening identify children at risk for school problems? Early Hum Dev 2007 Sep;83(9):613-617.
- Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA, Perrin EM, Katznelson J, Rice HE. Does this child have appendicitis? JAMA 2007 Jul 25;298(4):438-451.
- Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine Section on Ophthalmology, American Association of Certified Orthoptists, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Eye examination in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians: organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children. Ophthalmology 2003 Apr;110(4):860-865.
- Even L, Heno N, Talmon Y, Samet E, Zonis Z, Kugelman A. Diagnostic evaluation of foreign body aspiration in children: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 2005 Jul;40(7):1122-1127.
- Fong DY, Lee CF, Cheung KM, Cheng JC, Ng BK, Lam TP, et al. A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 May 1;35(10):1061-1071.
- Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinold C, Krebs NF, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0-59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010 Sep 10;59(RR-9):1-15.
- Harlor AD,Jr, Bower C, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Section on Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Hearing assessment in infants and children: recommendations beyond neonatal screening. Pediatrics 2009 Oct;124(4):1252-1263.
- Holleman DR,Jr, Simel DL. Does the clinical examination predict airflow limitation? JAMA 1995 Jan 25;273(4):313-319.
- Karachalios T, Sofianos J, Roidis N, Sapkas G, Korres D, Nikolopoulos K. Ten-year follow-up evaluation of a school screening program for scoliosis. Is the forward-bending test an accurate diagnostic criterion for the screening of scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 Nov 15;24(22):2318-2324.
- Kharbanda AB, Fishman SJ, Bachur RG. Comparison of pediatric emergency physicians' and surgeons' evaluation and diagnosis of appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 2008 Feb;15(2):119-125.
- Mellis C. Respiratory noises: how useful are they clinically? Pediatr Clin North Am 2009 Feb;56(1):1-17, ix.
- National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004 Aug;114(2 Suppl 4th Report):555-576.
- O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Carlin JB, Morley CJ. Interobserver variability of the 5-minute Apgar score. J Pediatr 2006 Oct;149(4):486-489.
- Ogedegbe G, Pickering T. Principles and techniques of blood pressure measurement. Cardiol Clin 2010 Nov;28(4):571-586.
- Panagiotou L, Rourke LL, Rourke JT, Wakefield JG, Winfield D. Evidence-based well-baby care. Part 1: Overview of the next generation of the Rourke Baby Record. Can Fam Physician 1998 Mar;44:558-567.
- Patel H, Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. CMAJ 2001 Jun 12;164(12):1669-1677.
- Powers JH. Diagnosis and treatment of acute otitis media: evaluating the evidence. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2007 Jun;21(2):409-26, vi.
- Rothman R, Owens T, Simel DL. Does this child have acute otitis media? JAMA 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1633-1640.
- Shah S, Bachur R, Kim D, Neuman MI. Lack of predictive value of tachypnea in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010 May;29(5):406-409.
- Steiner MJ, DeWalt DA, Byerley JS. Is this child dehydrated? JAMA 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2746-2754.
- Stevens MW, Gorelick MH, Schultz T. Interrater agreement in the clinical evaluation of acute pediatric asthma. J Asthma 2003 May;40(3):311-315.
- Zafeiriou DI. Primitive reflexes and postural reactions in the neurodevelopmental examination. Pediatr Neurol 2004 Jul;31(1):1-8.